Penetration testing

Penetration testing

Gaining Access in Penetration Testing Phase 3

Gaining access in penetration testing shows how a real attacker can enter a system. This stage reveals the strength or weakness of a target. Idealsols uses this phase to help companies understand real world entry points with clear evidence. Meaning of Gaining Access in Penetration Testing This phase focuses on entering a system after reconnaissance and scanning. It checks how a threat actor uses weak passwords, misconfigurations, faulty authentication, exposed services, and flawed code to break into networks, apps, cloud platforms, and websites. Pentesters collect exact proof to show the path taken to gain access so businesses can fix every weak point. Why Gaining Access Matters for Every Business Gaining access allows a pentester to prove the risk in real time. It shows how fast a target can fall if its controls fail. Real studies show that pentesters entered internal networks in ninety six percent of tests. Some entered within one hour while full privilege took six hours and thirty minutes in several tests. These numbers show how critical this phase is for defence. Core Principles That Guide This Phase Idealsols performs these steps for businesses across Pakistan and worldwide. Main Entry Methods Observed in Real Tests Pentesters look at actions attackers usually attempt. The goal is to recreate real behaviour with safe processes. Each method fits different systems based on the environment tested. Gaining Access in Networks Real world reports show that pentesters achieved initial entry in almost every network test. Password spraying worked in forty nine percent of attempts. Password guessing allowed entry in thirty three percent. Password cracking gave access in sixteen percent. Idealsols uses controlled methods to find weak internal paths. The team reviews open services, shared folders, user accounts, and exposed ports to find the weakest entry vector. Gaining Access in Web Applications Web apps commonly fail at authentication and input checks. Studies show that malicious file uploads caused seven percent of critical entry points. Code injected through web shells counted for two point one percent. Attacks that use external XML entities created eight point one percent of breaches. The Idealsols team analyses web app flaws through exposed forms, upload features, session flow, and backend calls. Every access path is documented with simple and clear proof. Gaining Access in Cloud Systems Cloud tests found an average of fifteen weaknesses during one test. Nearly half of modern data breaches happen in cloud setups. Human error caused eighty two percent of the incidents. Idealsols checks access policies, identity roles, storage rules, admin panels, exposed buckets, and open cloud ports. The team maps internal structure to show the exact steps of entry. Gaining Access in API Environments APIs suffer from weak access controls. Improper authorization created seven percent of web attacks that involved APIs. Server side request issues added four point six percent. Idealsols checks endpoints, roles, tokens, and backend communication. The goal is to find any point that lets someone act as another user. Gaining Access in Mobile Apps Mobile tests often review code storage, device controls, data caching, and unsafe calls. Pentesters inspect apps on three or more devices. They also analyse network communication to catch weak points. Weak checks, exposed sessions, and unsafe data storage lead to direct entry. Idealsols maps each mobile endpoint and collects proof of unsafe behaviour. How Idealsols Documents Gained Access Prevention Steps After Gaining Access Idealsols guides each company with direct and simple actions. Frequently Asked Questions

Penetration testing

Scanning & Enumeration in Penetration Testing: The Phase 2 Where Real Exposure Begins

After Reconnaissance, phase two begins with scanning & enumeration in penetration testing, the stage where hidden details surface and real attack paths form. What makes scanning and enumeration so important in phase two? Scanning and enumeration build the bridge between simple observation and full technical discovery. In this stage, every port, every service, and every system detail becomes a clue. Think of it like reading a city map at night: scanning switches on the streetlights, and enumeration lets you walk through every alley to see who lives where. That’s exactly why Idealsols treats this phase as a measurable and high-value operation for both B2B and B2C clients. This phase is designed to reveal exact system behavior. It uncovers running services, active devices, exposed ports, user accounts, and vulnerable components. Real numbers matter here. A single Nmap scan may hit 1 to 65,535 ports, a cloud scan may review hundreds of resources, and a web scan usually tests 1,000+ known attack patterns. Scanning answers:“What exists?”Enumeration answers:“What can it tell us?” How does scanning begin in phase two of penetration testing? Scanning begins by identifying live hosts across the target environment. Host discovery uses ICMP requests, ARP checks, reverse DNS lookups, and in many cases hybrid scanning where multiple discovery techniques run together. A typical enterprise scan may probe hundreds of IP addresses per sweep. Idealsols handles this process with complete precision so every small or large-scale network receives the same level of accuracy. This is also where penetration testers create a service map. Every open port, filtered port, and closed port signals something about the target’s security posture. Example:If port 22 is open, enumeration will check SSH banner details.If port 445 is open, enumeration moves straight into SMB inspection.If port 389 is open, LDAP enumeration begins. The logic is simple: scanning finds it, enumeration talks to it. What scanning techniques help uncover hidden attack surfaces? Different scanning styles reveal different layers of exposure. Here are the most reliable methods: TCP SYN Scan Sends SYN packets to identify open ports quickly. Often called “half-open scan” because it never completes the handshake. TCP XMAS Scan Uses URG, FIN, and PSH flags. A closed port responds with RST, while an open port stays silent. Useful for systems that behave differently under flag manipulation. TCP ACK Scan Checks firewall rules and verifies which hosts are reachable. This is useful for locating active devices without making too much noise. UDP Scan Targets ports running stateless services. Often slower but effective on UNIX systems such as Solaris. This reveals services like DNS, SNMP, and NTP. ARP Scan Used inside local networks to discover every device connected to the subnet. Masscan & Zmap High-speed scanners capable of scanning the entire internet in minutes, used only when allowed by a strict scope. Each technique answers a single question: “What is reachable and what is alive?” How does enumeration extract deeper details after scanning? Enumeration moves into direct interaction. This is where systems reveal real secrets—usernames, group details, roles, banners, versions, directory structures, and even trust relationships. Enumeration typically covers: If scanning shines a flashlight, enumeration opens the door and steps inside. Which enumeration methods give maximum technical insight? Service Enumeration Every discovered port is interrogated. For example: Service enumeration answers how a system behaves under specific queries. Banner Grabbing Tools such as Netcat, Nmap, Telnet, and cURL reveal version numbers and configurations. A single banner can expose: Directory Enumeration For websites, tools like Gobuster, Dirbuster, FFUF, and Photon uncover hidden directories, file paths, and admin pages. Cloud Enumeration Cloud security scans extract: Often 100+ cloud resources are checked in a single enumeration cycle. How does enumeration scale across web application testing? Application penetration testing extends enumeration into the deeper layers of app logic. Automated scanners test thousands of vulnerability signatures, while manual inspectors uncover logical flaws. Enumeration checks: Typical apps have 15–30 primary endpoints, but modern apps with microservices may expose hundreds of micro-endpoints. Enumeration breaks them down one by one. How does enumeration work in mobile app penetration testing? Mobile apps reveal information differently because they rely on multiple components. Idealsols handles mobile enumeration across: Enumeration extracts hidden data like: How does cloud scanning and enumeration uncover misconfigurations? Cloud penetration testing requires broader coverage because everything interacts through shared resources. Enumeration identifies: An average cloud scan touches hundreds of cloud resources, and enumeration often uncovers dozens of misconfigured roles that attackers could exploit. Why is enumeration essential for website penetration testing? Websites expose details through headers, responses, cookie behavior, and underlying framework signatures. Idealsols performs: Tools such as Burp Suite and ZAP extract dozens of vulnerable endpoints during a single test. What does scanning and enumeration reveal from a security perspective? This phase shows: The value comes from clarity. Every discovered detail is evidence. How does Idealsols combine scanning and enumeration for full visibility? The Idealsols process is built to uncover measurable security exposure: Every finding is backed with screenshots, logs, and packet captures for strong technical evidence. How does evidence collection strengthen the penetration testing report? Evidence makes results undeniable. Enumeration provides: The more evidence collected, the stronger the remediation guidance. How does scanning and enumeration fit into well-known frameworks? This phase aligns with: Framework alignment ensures consistency and technical depth. How does enumeration impact exploitability? Once enumeration reveals: The exploitation probability increases significantly. Enumeration often determines whether a system is exploitable or not. FAQ

Penetration testing

Reconnaissance in Penetration Testing: The Foundation of Every Successful Pentest

Reconnaissance is where every penetration test begins. It’s the phase where information transforms into insight, and insight becomes a blueprint for ethical exploitation. Understanding the Role of Reconnaissance in Penetration Testing In penetration testing, reconnaissance—often called the information-gathering phase—isn’t just data collection. It’s strategy in motion. At IdealSolutions, this phase defines how deep, accurate, and effective the entire test will be. Analysts explore every corner of the digital environment to uncover what attackers might already know. Statistics highlight its importance. Around 73% of successful breaches originate from web application vulnerabilities, often discovered through reconnaissance. Nearly 51% of businesses rely entirely on external penetration testers, trusting their expertise in advanced recon techniques. The Core Purpose of Reconnaissance in Penetration Testing The main goal of recon is simple yet powerful: collect as much relevant information about the target system as possible—without being detected. This data becomes the foundation for mapping attack surfaces, identifying weak points, and defining exploitation paths. Whether it’s a web app, mobile app, cloud infrastructure, or corporate network, every recon strategy adapts based on the environment. IdealSolutions uses both passive and active reconnaissance methods to maximize efficiency and minimize noise. Types of Reconnaissance in Penetration testing Passive Reconnaissance: Staying Invisible While Gathering Intel Passive reconnaissance focuses on collecting data without directly touching the target systems. This includes searching public databases, DNS records, WHOIS lookups, leaked credentials, and analyzing employee information on LinkedIn or GitHub. Techniques used include: Passive reconnaissance reduces the risk of detection, which is vital in stealth or compliance-sensitive operations. Interestingly, 73% of perimeter breaches start from misconfigured web applications—information that’s often identifiable purely through passive techniques. Active Reconnaissance: The Hands-On Discovery Active reconnaissance involves interacting directly with target systems to reveal live information. It includes scanning, probing, and mapping networks using tools such as Nmap, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, and Recon-ng. Steps include: While passive recon gathers what’s visible, active recon uncovers what’s hidden. However, it must always follow ethical and legal boundaries, often defined in the client’s Rules of Engagement (ROE). Passive vs Active Reconnaissance Passive reconnaissance gathers information silently, without touching the target directly. It includes: This method helps testers understand an organization’s online footprint while staying invisible. Active reconnaissance, on the other hand, directly engages with the target. It involves scanning, enumeration, and service probing using tools like: The key difference lies in visibility: passive recon hides, active recon knocks. IdealSolutions blends both to create a complete, risk-balanced reconnaissance model. Reconnaissance for Application Penetration Testing Web and application layers are prime targets. Here’s where recon reveals gold: 73% of all breaches link back to web application weaknesses. By focusing on framework versions, API behaviors, and hidden paths, IdealSolutions’ recon process strengthens the attack simulation’s precision. Mobile Application Reconnaissance Mobile apps often connect to vast backends—APIs, cloud storage, and authentication services. Recon here focuses on: The process uncovers unprotected APIs, weak encryption, and misconfigured authentication—all common in 58% of tested mobile apps. Cloud Reconnaissance and Asset Discovery Modern infrastructures rely heavily on cloud services. Cloud recon focuses on identifying storage leaks, exposed services, and misconfigured permissions. Common tools include: Studies show 62% of pentest targets contain a mix of critical and high vulnerabilities due to cloud misconfiguration, making recon indispensable. Key Steps of Reconnaissance in a Pentest Every professional pentester follows a structured approach: Each step refines understanding of the environment, ensuring precision in later testing phases. Reconnaissance in Ethical Hacking and Red Team Operations In red teaming, recon acts as the intelligence backbone. Analysts simulate adversaries using OSINT, technical scanning, and behavioral profiling. They map MITRE ATT&CK tactics such as T1592 (Gather Victim Host Info) and T1595 (Active Scanning) to maintain alignment with global frameworks. IdealSolutions integrates these frameworks with its ethical hacking methodology to ensure results are realistic and compliance-ready. Advanced Reconnaissance Automation and Tools Automation transforms recon from hours into minutes. Advanced frameworks like Recon-ng, Maltego, and SpiderFootaggregate vast data into actionable intelligence. Scripts written in Python, Bash, or PowerShell automate repetitive discovery tasks such as: This automation minimizes manual errors and improves recon depth by up to 40%, based on IdealSolutions’ internal test benchmarks. Data Organization and Reporting After Reconnaissance Once data is collected, the challenge is not just knowing—it’s understanding. Organizing recon data means classifying it by priority, severity, and exploit potential. Modern tools like Maltego, XMind, and Neo4j visualize connections between IPs, users, domains, and infrastructures. The output isn’t just technical—it’s intelligence. IdealSolutions presents recon findings with evidence-backed clarity, ensuring business owners understand risk impact, not just risk presence. Legal and Ethical Boundaries of Reconnaissance Reconnaissance operates in a delicate zone between intelligence and intrusion. Ethical testing always aligns with client approval, GDPR compliance, and NIST reconnaissance guidelines. At IdealSolutions, each active test begins only after documented authorization and a clear Rules of Engagement (RoE) to ensure full legality and transparency. The Business Impact of Strong Reconnaissance A solid recon phase determines the quality of the entire penetration test. Organizations that emphasize recon accuracy report: By revealing the unseen, reconnaissance helps businesses strengthen digital trust and defense before attackers even try. Why Reconnaissance Defines the Strength of Your Pentest Think of reconnaissance as the blueprint before building a fortress. Without it, defenses remain reactive, not proactive. At IdealSolutions, recon isn’t a phase—it’s the foundation of every security engagement. Every scan, lookup, and analysis aims for one goal: to uncover what others overlook. Because in cybersecurity, knowing more always means being safer. Final Thoughts Now you understand the critical role of reconnaissance in penetration testing. If you have any questions or want to avail professional penetration testing services with free consultancy, feel free to contact IdealSolutions – leading cybersecurity company in Pakistan. Additional Resources FAQ

Penetration testing

What to Include in a Penetration Test Report: A Complete Guide by IdealSolutions

A well-structured penetration testing report not only identifies vulnerabilities but also provides actionable recommendations to protect critical assets. IdealSolutions, a leading cybersecurity company in Pakistan with branches in the USA, Spain, and Dubai, has been delivering comprehensive penetration testing services since 2016. This guide explores every essential element of a penetration test report, offering examples, formatting tips, and best practices for businesses and technical teams. Interactive Penetration Test Report Generator — IdealSols IS Interactive Penetration Test Report Generator — IdealSols Generate a sample, visual, and actionable penetration testing report tailored to the asset type. Quick samples for demonstration or client previews. Call us: +923312721327 IdealSols — Cybersecurity & Penetration Testing • Islamabad Create a sample penetration testing report 1. Enter website / app / asset name 2. Select penetration test type Web ApplicationMobile ApplicationNetworkAPICloudIoT / EmbeddedRed Team 3. Generate sample Generate Quick Report Generate Standard Report Generate Comprehensive Report Quick = 1-page executive sample • Standard = ~10–25 pages outline • Comprehensive = full technical sample (expanded) Preview stats Total Findings — Critical — Medium — Low — Report format Export PDF (sample) Export Word (sample) Contact +923312721327 Report — Executive Summary No sample generated yet. Enter an asset name, choose a test type, and click a generate button to see a sample penetration testing report from IdealSols. Risk Distribution Low Med High Visual risk heatmap — generated from sample data Quick tools & metadata Generated by IdealSols — Penetration Testing Unit Sample metadata Test Type — Start Date — Duration — Report Version — Want a real penetration test for your business? Contact IdealSols to schedule a full engagement — tailored scope, legal clearance, and certified testers. +923312721327 Available Mon–Sat • Islamabad & Global © IdealSols — Penetration Testing & Cybersecurity. Registered in Pakistan. Use this interactive generator for sample/demo purposes only. Executive Summary in Penetration Test Reports The executive summary provides a high-level overview of the penetration test findings. It is designed for non-technical stakeholders, such as C-level executives or management teams. This section should be concise, typically 1–2 pages, highlighting the overall security posture, critical vulnerabilities, and remediation priorities. For instance: The executive summary should emphasize business impact and suggested next steps without technical jargon, enabling decision-makers to prioritize resources effectively. Scope of Testing Clearly defining the scope of penetration testing is essential to set expectations and establish boundaries. IdealSolutions recommends including: A well-documented scope ensures accountability and legal compliance while guiding the technical team on where to focus testing efforts. Methodology Breakdown A structured methodology demonstrates how vulnerabilities were identified and validated. This section typically spans 3–5 pages and includes: Tools used, such as Burp Suite, Nessus, Nmap, SQLmap, ZAP Proxy, and custom scripts, should be listed with version numbers for reproducibility. Technical Findings and Vulnerability Details This section is the core of any penetration testing report, detailing each identified vulnerability. It should include: For example: Each finding should maintain semantic relevance to the asset it affects, ensuring clarity and actionable guidance. Remediation Steps and Prioritization Remediation recommendations should align with risk levels, business priorities, and resource availability. A structured remediation table often includes:VulnerabilityRisk RatingRecommended ActionResponsible TeamTimelineSQL InjectionCriticalImplement prepared statementsDev Team2 WeeksWeak Password PolicyHighEnforce MFA and password complexityIT Team1 Month This allows organizations to quickly track progress and ensure critical issues are addressed first. Tools and Techniques Used A penetration test report should document manual and automated tools used during the engagement, including: Including this information demonstrates the depth of testing and supports audit and compliance needs. Evidence and Screenshots Visual proof strengthens the credibility of findings. Screenshots, exploit code samples, and logs provide: Reports may include 100–200 screenshots for large engagements, particularly in red team or multi-asset assessments. Risk Ratings and CVSS Scores Risk rating should combine quantitative scoring and qualitative assessment. The CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) standardizes vulnerability severity, typically: Use heatmaps, graphs, and trend analysis to visualize risk distribution across assets, enhancing executive comprehension. False Positive Handling A section should clarify which findings are false positives and provide justification. This avoids unnecessary remediation efforts and supports accuracy. IdealSolutions ensures all vulnerabilities are verified before inclusion. Compliance and Standards Mapping Penetration testing often aligns with regulatory requirements, including: Each technical finding should reference applicable standards to demonstrate compliance alignment. Technical Appendices Appendices provide detailed technical information for developers and security teams. Typical inclusions: Executive Dashboard and Visualization For large-scale engagements, an executive dashboard provides at-a-glance insights: Interactive dashboards, exported as PDF or Word, allow management to filter and review data efficiently. Retesting and Verification Post-remediation, retesting ensures vulnerabilities are fixed. The report should document: Including a rescan summary table quantifies improvements and supports continuous security assurance. Report Formatting and Distribution Penetration test reports should maintain consistent formatting for readability and legal clarity: For organizations requiring repeated engagements, versioning and change tracking are essential. Industry Best Practices IdealSolutions emphasizes: Specialized Penetration Reports Depending on asset types, reports may include: Each specialized report maintains consistent structure while addressing asset-specific threats and risks. Appendices, Glossaries, and References Reports should conclude with: This ensures clarity for all stakeholders and provides a knowledge base for future assessments. Length and Content Recommendations Typical reports vary in length based on engagement complexity: Content should balance technical depth with executive readability, maintaining semantic cohesion throughout. Confidentiality and Legal Considerations Penetration testing reports contain sensitive security information. Best practices include: Final Thoughts Now you know what to include in a penetration test report. If you have any questions or want to avail penetration testing services with free consultancy, feel free to contact IdealSolutions—leading Pakistan cybersecurity firm. Additional Resources FAQ

Penetration testing

Cost of Penetration Testing in Pakistan – Invest Smartly in Cybersecurity for 2026

The cost of penetration testing in Pakistan varies from PKR 100,000 to PKR 8,100,000, depending on the scope, type, and depth of assessment provided by IdealSolutions, a trusted cybersecurity leader since 2016. Evaluate Overall Penetration Testing Cost Based on Multiple Factors Comprehensive Cost Evaluation Sheet for Penetration Testing & Vulnerability Assessment in Pakistan Service Type Business Type Scope & Complexity Duration Pricing Model Estimated Cost (PKR) Testing Coverage Deliverables IdealSolutions Recommendation Web Application Penetration Testing Small to Mid Business Static / CMS Website 5–7 Days Fixed Price 100,000 – 300,000 OWASP Top 10, Manual & Automated Scans Detailed Report + Fix Suggestions Best for small websites and startups securing first-time deployments. Web Application Penetration Testing Enterprise / E-commerce Dynamic / Payment Integrated 10–15 Days Project Based 300,000 – 500,000 Advanced Vulnerability Simulation + Business Logic Flaws Comprehensive Attack Surface & Remediation Plan Recommended for high-traffic and payment systems requiring deep analysis. Mobile Application Penetration Testing Startup / SME Single Platform (Android or iOS) 5–7 Days Fixed Price 100,000 – 250,000 API, Storage, and Communication Testing Findings Report with CVSS Ratings Ideal for apps before Play Store or App Store launch. Mobile Application Penetration Testing Enterprise Multi-Platform / Backend Integration 10–20 Days Time-Based 300,000 – 500,000 Server-side, Authentication, and Encryption Audits Technical Report + Exploitation Proof Essential for businesses handling financial or user data. Cloud Penetration Testing Corporate / SaaS Provider AWS, Azure, Google Cloud 10–15 Days Project Based 250,000 – 400,000 Identity Misconfigurations, Access Control, Policy Testing Cloud Risk Summary & Compliance Report Recommended for organizations using multi-cloud infrastructures. Network Penetration Testing Enterprise / Government External + Internal Networks 7–12 Days Project Based 200,000 – 600,000 Firewall, Router, and Endpoint Security Tests Risk Matrix & Mitigation Roadmap Ideal for IT-heavy environments and secured infrastructure mapping. API / SaaS Penetration Testing Enterprise / FinTech / SaaS Multiple APIs & Endpoints 15–25 Days Project Based 1,350,000 – 8,100,000 Authentication, Authorization, and Rate-Limit Tests Attack Surface Report + Exploit Demonstration Best for platforms with sensitive transaction or user data. Source Code Review Software Development Firms Custom Web / Mobile Applications 7–15 Days Per LOC (Lines of Code) From 150,000 Upwards Static & Dynamic Code Analysis Line-by-Line Vulnerability Review Ideal for development teams ensuring secure deployment pipelines. Vulnerability Assessment All Business Sizes Comprehensive System Scan 3–5 Days Subscription / One-time 75,000 – 200,000 Surface Level and Configuration Weakness Detection Executive Summary + Quick Fix Guide Best suited for regular maintenance and quick compliance checks. Red Team Penetration Testing Enterprise / Government Full-Scope Offensive Simulation 15–30 Days Project Based 500,000 – 2,000,000 Social Engineering + Network Breach Testing Comprehensive Breach Simulation Report Essential for large organizations testing real-world resilience. Wireless Network Penetration Testing Corporate / Retail Wi-Fi, Access Points, IoT Devices 4–6 Days Fixed Price 120,000 – 250,000 Encryption Strength, Rogue AP Detection Security Audit + Remediation Plan Recommended for offices and public networks handling customer access. IoT Device Penetration Testing Manufacturers / Smart Tech Device Firmware and Protocol Testing 10–20 Days Project Based 250,000 – 600,000 Firmware Reverse Engineering & Exploit Tests Detailed Firmware and Interface Report Crucial for IoT product companies and automation systems. Annual Security Audit with Penetration Testing Corporate / SME Full IT Environment Annual Contract Subscription 500,000 – 1,000,000 / year Comprehensive Testing Cycle + Continuous Monitoring Quarterly Reports + Year-end Audit Certificate Ideal for businesses aiming for ISO 27001 or PCI DSS compliance. Compliance-based Penetration Testing Healthcare / Finance / SaaS HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR 10–15 Days Project Based 350,000 – 900,000 Regulation-specific Exploitation Scenarios Compliance Verification Report Recommended for regulatory-driven industries. 📞 Call IdealSolutions Cybersecurity Experts Now: +92 331 2721327 — Get a Free Consultation & Cost Estimate Today! the Real Cost of Penetration Testing Penetration testing is more than a technical audit; it’s a financial decision about risk, protection, and business continuity. In Pakistan, companies invest anywhere between PKR 100,000 and PKR 500,000 for standard web or mobile penetration testing. Larger enterprises with complex infrastructures or cloud ecosystems often spend PKR 300,000 and beyond to ensure complete coverage and compliance. Each rupee invested returns measurable value — preventing data breaches that could cost millions. That’s why businesses choose IdealSolutions, a company registered under SECP and PSEB, recognized for transparent pricing and results-driven testing. Web Application Penetration Testing Price Overview Basic web penetration testing usually starts around PKR 100,000, ideal for small business websites or startups. For e-commerce platforms or dynamic web systems, prices typically range from PKR 200,000 to PKR 500,000, depending on the number of pages, user roles, and integrations. The pricing reflects manual and automated testing processes, use of real-world exploit simulations, and post-test remediation guidance — ensuring your site is resilient against cyberattacks. Mobile Application Penetration Testing Cost Range Mobile app security testing generally costs between PKR 100,000 and PKR 500,000. Factors such as app size, user base, and framework (iOS, Android, or cross-platform) influence the overall budget. IdealSolutions specialists focus on in-depth testing of APIs, backend logic, and encryption protocols, providing a clear vulnerability-to-cost balance. Cloud Penetration Testing Pricing Insights Cloud infrastructure assessments typically cost around PKR 300,000. However, this may rise with multi-cloud environments or hybrid configurations. Evaluations include identity misconfigurations, privilege escalations, and real-time data exposure testing. Businesses leveraging AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud often prioritize cloud testing as part of annual compliance budgets. Network and API Penetration Testing Cost Breakdown Network penetration testing varies according to internal and external scope. While no fixed rate applies, project-based pricing ensures flexibility for small networks or enterprise-level infrastructure. For API and SaaS testing, pricing can reach PKR 1,350,000 to PKR 8,100,000, converted from global benchmarks of $5,000 to $30,000 USD. These assessments require advanced simulation tools and certified ethical hackers, such as those at IdealSolutions, led by Zubair Khan, an EC-Council Certified Ethical Hacker. Factors Influencing Penetration Testing Prices Penetration testing pricing depends on numerous variables: Organizations planning yearly audits often allocate PKR 300,000 to PKR 1,000,000 for combined testing packages — an investment that aligns with both risk mitigation and regulatory readiness. Average Penetration Testing Price in Pakistan Across Pakistan, the average penetration testing cost falls between PKR 200,000 and PKR 500,000 for

Penetration testing

Manual Penetration Testing vs Automated Penetration Testing: 10 Key Differences

Manual and automated penetration testing both aim to uncover vulnerabilities, yet their approach, accuracy, and depth of analysis differ significantly. IdealSols, a trusted cybersecurity company in Pakistan, blends both methods to deliver unmatched precision and protection. comparison between manual penetration testing and automated penetration testing Comprehensive Comparison: Manual Penetration Testing vs Automated Penetration Testing in Cybersecurity Aspect Manual Penetration Testing Automated Penetration Testing Testing Approach Performed manually by cybersecurity experts simulating real-world attacks through creativity and reasoning. Executed by automated tools using predefined scripts, algorithms, and vulnerability databases. Accuracy Highly accurate with minimal false positives due to expert validation. Faster but prone to false positives and false negatives. Speed Slower, requires detailed manual effort and human analysis. Extremely fast, capable of scanning thousands of endpoints within minutes. Cost Higher cost due to expert time and manual labor. Lower cost, ideal for frequent or large-scale scans. Scope of Coverage Focused and deep, identifies complex business logic flaws. Broad but shallow, limited to known vulnerabilities. Human Involvement Relies entirely on ethical hackers’ skills and real-world experience. Requires minimal human intervention once configured. Adaptability Can adapt to new attack patterns and unique system environments. Restricted to the scope of programmed vulnerability signatures. Tool Dependency Uses multiple tools but primarily depends on human logic and testing methods. Fully depends on software capabilities and regular updates. Reporting Quality Provides detailed, business-focused reports with risk analysis and mitigation steps. Generates automated technical reports with limited context. Scalability Less scalable for large infrastructures; ideal for targeted tests. Highly scalable for enterprise-level network assessments. Use Case Critical systems requiring deep logic and real-world scenario analysis. Routine vulnerability scanning, compliance audits, and continuous monitoring. False Positives Rare due to expert validation and manual cross-verification. More frequent due to automated signature misreads. Customization Fully customizable according to environment, risks, and objectives. Limited customization based on tool configuration. Complex Vulnerability Detection Excellent at finding logical, chained, and zero-day vulnerabilities. Restricted to identifying known CVEs and standard attack vectors. Continuous Testing Performed periodically based on business needs. Can run continuously for proactive security monitoring. Integration with CI/CD Limited integration; usually performed separately from pipelines. Easily integrates with CI/CD tools for DevSecOps workflows. Skill Requirement Requires skilled cybersecurity professionals with certifications like CEH or OSCP. Requires basic understanding of security tools and automation setup. Remediation Guidance Provides practical, business-oriented remediation strategies. Offers automated suggestions often lacking situational context. Response Simulation Simulates realistic attacker behavior, testing incident response effectiveness. Identifies weaknesses without simulating response mechanisms. Ideal Choice Best for organizations seeking in-depth analysis, precision, and real-world insight. Best for organizations needing speed, scalability, and frequent assessments. 1. Depth of Discovery vs Breadth of Coverage Manual penetration testing focuses on depth — human testers analyze systems with intuition and reasoning that tools can’t replicate. They uncover complex logic flaws that automation often overlooks. Automated penetration testing, on the other hand, focuses on breadth — scanning vast networks and applications in minutes, identifying known vulnerabilities efficiently.Key difference: manual testing excels in quality and depth, whereas automated testing offers wider yet surface-level detection. 2. Human Intelligence vs Machine Efficiency In manual testing, cybersecurity experts apply creativity and contextual thinking to exploit vulnerabilities much like real hackers would. Automated testing relies on algorithms and signatures that follow predefined patterns.Key difference: human testers adapt in real time, while automated tools execute pre-scripted checks. 3. Accuracy vs Speed Manual penetration testing ensures high accuracy, as experts validate each finding before reporting. However, it takes more time. Automated testing delivers rapid results but may generate false positives.Key difference: accuracy favors manual testing, whereas speed favors automation. 4. Contextual Understanding vs Repetitive Scanning A manual test assesses systems in context — business logic, data sensitivity, and real-world exploitation scenarios. Automated tools perform repetitive scans, missing context-driven threats such as multi-step attacks.Key difference: manual testing provides contextual understanding; automation offers consistency in repetitive tasks. 5. Cost Implications vs Value Output Manual testing typically costs more due to expert involvement and detailed reporting. Automated testing reduces costs by using scalable tools. However, IdealSols recommends balancing both, as overlooking manual analysis can lead to higher long-term losses from undetected breaches.Key difference: manual testing offers long-term value; automated testing minimizes immediate expense. 6. Realistic Exploitation vs Simulated Detection Manual testers simulate real cyberattacks — testing not only vulnerabilities but also how security teams respond. Automated systems simulate detections without fully exploiting weaknesses.Key difference: manual testing mimics real attackers, while automation provides simulated awareness. 7. Skill Dependency vs Tool Dependency Manual penetration testing relies on the tester’s skills, experience, and certifications. At IdealSols, CEH-certified professionals manually evaluate systems using adaptive techniques. Automated testing depends on tool quality and configuration accuracy.Key difference: manual testing depends on human expertise; automated testing depends on software intelligence. 8. Reporting Depth vs Automated Summaries Manual testers deliver customized reports explaining vulnerabilities, impact, and actionable mitigation steps. Automated testing generates generic reports without context.Key difference: manual reports are tailored and insightful, while automated reports are structured and technical. 9. Scalability vs Personalization Automated testing scales easily across multiple systems, making it ideal for large infrastructures. Manual testing provides personalized attention, ideal for high-value targets like banking systems or healthcare databases.Key difference: automation scales; manual analysis personalizes. 10. Continuous Monitoring vs Periodic Assessment Automated penetration testing tools can be configured for continuous monitoring. Manual testing, however, is conducted periodically to ensure deeper audits after major updates. IdealSols integrates both methods — automation for routine checks and manual for comprehensive audits.Key difference: automation enables ongoing vigilance, while manual testing ensures strategic assurance. Final Thoughts: Balancing Manual and Automated Testing for Maximum Security The smartest cybersecurity strategy isn’t choosing one over the other — it’s using both. Manual testing brings precision, creativity, and realism. Automated testing ensures speed, scalability, and efficiency. Together, they create a comprehensive defense strategy that protects businesses from emerging and evolving cyber threats. IdealSols, with its certified ethical hackers and global expertise, delivers hybrid penetration testing solutions tailored to each organization’s risk landscape. Whether it’s your web application, mobile app, or network infrastructure, our experts ensure no vulnerability goes unnoticed. FAQ

Penetration testing

10 Best SQL Injection Detection Tools

So, let’s dive into the top 10 SQL injection detection tools in 2025—their features, pros, cons, and the real-world scenarios where they shine. At IdealSolutions, we emphasize that choosing the right SQLi vulnerability scanner isn’t just about features. It’s about finding the right fit for your business, whether you’re a solo ethical hacker experimenting with free SQL injection tools, or an enterprise requiring real-time web application security software integrated into CI/CD pipelines. 1. sqlmap – Best Free SQL Injection Detection Tool When people think about open-source SQL injection scanners, sqlmap is the first that comes to mind. What it is:sqlmap is a free, open-source penetration testing tool that automates the process of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Best suited for penetration testers and researchers who want advanced control over SQLi testing without paying a dime. 2. Invicti (Netsparker) – Best Enterprise SQLi Vulnerability Scanner What it is:Invicti, formerly known as Netsparker, is a commercial SQL injection detection tool designed for enterprises that require automated security testing across multiple web apps. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Ideal for medium to large organizations needing continuous scanning and professional-grade reporting. 3. Burp Scanner – Best for Professional Pen Testers What it is:Burp Scanner is part of the famous Burp Suite, a platform widely used in penetration testing. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Perfect for experienced pen testers and security consultants who want precision and flexibility. 4. jSQL Injection – Best Beginner-Friendly Open-Source Tool What it is:jSQL Injection is a lightweight Java-based SQLi testing software designed with a GUI. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Best for students, small teams, and beginner testers experimenting with SQL injection detection. 5. AppSpider – Best for Windows Environments What it is:AppSpider is a commercial web vulnerability scanner focused on OWASP Top 10 risks, including SQLi. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Perfect for Windows-centric enterprise environments with integrated DevOps pipelines. 6. Acunetix – Best for Complex Web Applications What it is:Acunetix is one of the leading SQL injection security testing software tools for enterprise web apps. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Ideal for enterprises with complex, modern applications needing in-depth coverage. 7. Qualys WAS – Best for Cloud Security Teams What it is:Qualys WAS is a cloud-native web app scanner with SQLi detection at scale. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Perfect for cloud-first organizations that need continuous monitoring. 8. HCL AppScan – Best for All-in-One Testing What it is:HCL AppScan offers DAST, SAST, and IAST scanning for SQL injection and beyond. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Best for enterprises with large development teams needing broad testing coverage. 9. Imperva – Best Real-Time SQL Injection Prevention Tool What it is:Unlike typical scanners, Imperva provides real-time SQL injection detection and blocking. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Best for organizations needing active defense rather than just detection. 10. ZeroThreat – Best for Modern Tech Stacks What it is:ZeroThreat is a next-gen DAST tool praised for speed and accuracy. Features: Pros: Cons: Usage:Best for modern startups and DevOps teams needing fast, automated SQLi scans. Final Thoughts: Which SQL Injection Detection Tool Should You Choose? FAQ

Penetration testing

Internal vs External Penetration Testing: 10 Key Differences

Knowing what’s happening inside and what’s trying to get in from the outside is absolutely crucial. That’s where internal penetration testing and external penetration testing come in. Both are powerful. Both serve different purposes. But how exactly are they different? And which one do you need more? Aspect Internal Penetration Testing External Penetration Testing Where does the attack start? Inside the network, behind the firewall—simulating a rogue user or compromised device. From the internet—testing how easily outsiders can break in. Main Goal To assess how far an attacker can go once they gain access. To identify vulnerabilities in public-facing systems that allow access into your network. Common Targets Internal apps, file shares, domain controllers, employee workstations. Web servers, APIs, DNS records, email servers, exposed databases. Attack Techniques Privilege escalation, lateral movement, credential harvesting. Subdomain enumeration, vulnerability scanning, brute force, web exploits. Complexity Level Often medium; relies on policy gaps and weak internal controls. Medium to high; involves multi-step attack chains and open surface area research. Time to Compromise As quick as 6.5 hours; average is 5 days to full control. Fastest breach: 1 hour; average perimeter breach takes 4–5 days. Vulnerabilities Exploited Weak password policies, outdated internal software, misconfigured access controls. Unpatched web apps, open ports, misconfigured DNS, exposed credentials. When is it most useful? Post-breach analysis, insider threat simulation, zero-trust validation. For compliance, vendor security checks, or before a product goes live. Recommended Frequency At least once a year, or after major internal changes. Quarterly, especially if launching new public-facing features or services. Reporting Style More technical, focuses on lateral pathways and internal user risks. More risk-oriented, focuses on breach potential and public exposure. Who Performs It? Often by red teams or internal security teams; sometimes outsourced to firms like IdealSolutions. Usually performed by external cybersecurity providers like IdealSolutions. Client Benefits See how far a breach can go, even if your perimeter is strong. Prevent breaches before they begin by patching surface-level holes. IdealSolutions Recommendation Essential for larger organizations with complex networks or insider risks. Critical for all businesses—especially those with public web presence. Want to test your network inside and out? 💻 Contact IdealSolutions today on WhatsApp +923312721327 for a free consultation. 10 differences between internal and external penetration testing 1. Definition: Internal vs External Penetration Testing? Internal penetration testing simulates attacks from within your network—think of it like testing what happens if an employee’s device gets infected or someone plugs in a rogue laptop.External penetration testing, however, simulates cyberattacks from outside your network, like a hacker trying to breach your firewall through a public-facing web application. In simpler words: Internal testing asks, “What if the bad guy is already inside?” External testing asks, “Can they break in from the outside?” 2. Attack Origin: Where Do the Tests Start? Internal pentests start from behind your firewall—already inside the perimeter.Whereas external pentests begin from the internet, with zero access or internal knowledge—like an outsider looking in. This changes everything. The internal test evaluates trust, while the external test evaluates exposure. 3. Objectives: What Is Each Trying to Achieve? Internal testing looks for how far an attacker can go if they gain entry.On the other hand, external testing aims to identify vulnerabilities that allow entry in the first place. For example, IdealSolutions often tests internal access by simulating privilege escalation or data exfiltration, while external tests target web app flaws, open ports, or exposed credentials. 4. Risk Surface: What Is Being Evaluated? Internal tests examine internal network infrastructure—user privileges, shared drives, outdated apps.However, external tests focus on public-facing assets like domains, email servers, cloud apps, and VPNs. And the numbers back this: 5. Complexity & Skills Required: Which Is Harder to Perform? Internal pentests often reveal low-complexity flaws—simple misconfigurations or weak policies.Whereas external tests involve advanced reconnaissance and multi-step exploits. Still, both require sharp minds. At IdealSolutions, our team of EC-Council Certified Ethical Hackers uses high-end tools and manual techniques for both test types. 6. Time to Breach: How Fast Can Attackers Compromise? This proves a critical point: Speed matters, and so does preparedness—both inside and out. 7. Tools & Techniques: What Methods Are Used? Internal tests use tools for lateral movement, privilege escalation, and credential dumping.External tests, however, rely on vulnerability scanners, subdomain enumeration, and zero-day hunting. For example: 8. Reports & Findings: What Kind of Results Do You Get? Internal reports usually highlight internal weak spots—access levels, security misconfigurations, user behaviors.In contrast, external reports focus on entry points, public exposure, and real-world attacker paths. At IdealSolutions, we provide clients with detailed, actionable findings, backed by evidence—helping B2B and B2C clients fix gaps before attackers find them. 9. Scenarios & Use Cases: When Is Each Test Performed? Did you know? 10. Remediation Steps: How Do You Fix What’s Found? Internal issues usually require user training, password policy changes, and access control reviews.However, external flaws demand firewall updates, WAF tuning, and patching web app vulnerabilities. Interestingly, 60% of internal vulnerabilities come from outdated software—something businesses often ignore because it’s “internal.” So, Which One Do You Need More? Here’s the truth: You need both.Think of internal and external testing like locking your front door (external) and locking your safe inside (internal). If you skip either, you’re exposed. That’s why IdealSolutions always recommends a comprehensive penetration testing strategy. And as Pakistan’s trusted cybersecurity brand, with presence in the USA, Spain, and Dubai, we’re helping businesses secure both their external perimeter and internal backbone. Final Thoughts Now you know the differences between both. If you have any questions or want to avail cybersecurity services with free consultancy, feel free to contact IdealSolutions—leading Pakistan cybersecurity firm. Additional Resources Frequently Asked Questions

Scroll to Top